By Canadian Press

Supreme Court to hear appeal of Quebec ruling that invalidated random police stops

May 1, 2025 | 8:47 AM

MONTREAL — The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear a case about whether it’s constitutional for police to make a random traffic stop without reasonable suspicion the driver has committed an offence.

Canada’s highest court announced today it has granted the Quebec government leave to appeal a lower court decision that said random stops lead to racial profiling.

The case involves Joseph-Christopher Luamba, a Montrealer of Haitian descent who said he had been stopped by police nearly a dozen times without reason, including several times when he was behind the wheel. None of the stops resulted in a ticket.

Quebec Superior Court Justice Michel Yergeau sided with Luamba in October 2022, saying that racial profiling exists and that it’s a reality that weighs heavily on Black people.

The Quebec government appealed the ruling, arguing that it deprived police of an important tool to stop crime, but the Court of Appeal upheld Yergeau’s decision.

preparations

Staff from gas stations, food stores, restaurants permitted to re-enter tri-communities early

4h ago

lack of tourism could ruin businesses

NDP, Northern Sask. businesses concerned about province's support

5h ago

Cockrill Convo

Highway twinning, care centre replacement highlights for Cockrill

6h ago

The Supreme Court will be asked to weigh in on whether stopping drivers with no apparent reason violates the Charter, and whether the Quebec judges made an error when they overturned a 1990 Supreme Court decision that upheld the practice of random stops.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 1, 2025.

The Canadian Press